Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
An. bras. dermatol ; 82(6): 572-574, nov.-dez. 2007. ilus
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-474987

ABSTRACT

A infecção pelo Scedosporium apiospermum pode tornar-se grave quando afeta pacientes imunodeprimidos, contexto em que diagnóstico e tratamento são geralmente difíceis. Os autores apresentam caso de paciente diabética usuária de ciclosporina, metotrexato e corticoesteróide sistêmico para o tramento de artrite reumatóide e que apresentou úlceras cutâneas pelo S. apiospermum. Após uso de itraconazol, sem sucesso, ocorreu resolução do quadro com o uso de voriconazol, nova alternativa para determinadas infecções fúngicas.


Infection by Scedosporium apiospermum may be severe when it affects immunosuppressed patients, circumstances under which diagnosis and treatment are difficult. The authors present the case of a diabetic patient using cyclosporine, methotrexate and systemic steroids to treat rheumatoid arthritis, who presented ulcers caused by S. apiospermum. After unsuccessful treatment with itraconazole, there was good response to voriconazole therapy. This drug represents a new alternative for the treatment of fungal infections.

2.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 4(2): 76-85, apr. 2000. tab, ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-278693

ABSTRACT

It is kmown that antimicrobials are often prescribed inappropriately. One method used to deal with problem is to regulate antimicrobial use by monitoring prescriptions. We report a study of physician compliance with the request for antibiotic process which was prepared and reviewed by a special infection control committee in our hospital - the Nosocomial Infection Prevention Service (SCHI). The objective of this study was to identify the profile of inappropriate requests for restricted therapeutic antimicrobials used at Nossa Senhora da Conceiçäo (HNSC), in Porto Alegre, Brazil. All 3,389 requests for therapeutic antimicrobials made between May 20, and October 31, 1996, were assesed ans classified as appropriate and inappropriate. We determined that 17.8 percent of the requests were innapropriate (a total of 720 errors). These were categorized according to 12 reasons for inappropriateness. Of these, the 3 most frequent inappropriate requests were deviation from standard use (26.73 percent), inappropriate length of treatment (23.19 percent), and unfounded justification (13.61 percent). The reasons for inappropriateness were also arranged in three categories considering the following aspects:I.technical (59 percent);II.compability with the institucional program (32.36 percent), and III.administrative (8.61 percent). The 720 requests that were initially rejected were evaluated to see how antibiotic use was affected. In approximately 400 (55 percent), the forms could be appropriately modified after discussion with physician. We conclude from this study that most of the inappropriate requests for antimicrobials in our hospital can be remedied by educating the staff since the errors were largely technical in nature. Thus, the SCIH should focus more on its role as an educational rather than as a regulatory body. By expanding this educational role, we antecipate improved physician compliance with our guidelines, and more appropriate antimicrobial prescribing and and usage.


Subject(s)
Drug Monitoring , Education, Medical , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Drug Utilization Review/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cohort Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL